Grammarly Review
The writing check almost everyone has used, now the doorway to a suite nobody asked it for.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Useful value prop | Good | |
| Ease to set up | Great | |
| Price | Average | |
| Overall | Good |
It works everywhere, and that is the whole product. The extension and the desktop app put the same checker into a browser, a mail client, a document and a text field on a form, so the correction happens where the writing happens rather than in a separate window nobody opens. The free tier catches real mistakes and is genuinely enough for most people.
The paid tier adds tone, clarity rewrites and a plagiarism check, and for anyone writing professionally in a second language it does work that is hard to buy elsewhere at that price. Two things drag on the verdict. The first is a value question. A general model in a browser tab now does most of the rewriting for nothing, so twelve dollars a month buys convenience and reach rather than capability, and reviews that used to be enthusiastic now hedge.
The second is conduct. A feature that attributed its editing suggestions to named subject matter experts drew a class action and was pulled in March after authors and journalists objected, which is the right ending to a thing that should never have shipped. The business tier bundles a mail client and a document tool a writer did not come for. Useful, still, and no longer the obvious purchase.
Grammarly at a glance
Official site- Pricing model
- Freemium, per member subscription
- Price
- Free; $12/mo (Pro); about $33/member/mo on the business tier billed annually
- Platforms
- Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android
- Founded
- 2009
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.