Buffy the Vampire Slayer artwork

Buffy the Vampire Slayer Review

1997Joss WhedonTV Show

The show that taught American television how to build a season, and how to make its teenagers talk.

CriticGreat
Users9.2 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
PlotGreat
CinematographyAverage
ActingGood
DialogueExceptional
OverallGreat

Buffy invents most of what serialized genre television now takes for granted: a season long villain, a monster of the week that doubles as a metaphor for the thing the characters cannot say, and an ensemble allowed to grow up on screen. Its influence is the first thing every retrospective reaches for, and the second is the language. The dialogue is the show's best axis by a distance, a compressed slang a generation of writers copied badly, and the two episodes that abandon it entirely, a silent one and a musical one, are still cited as high points of the medium.

The performances are uneven, strong from Sarah Michelle Gellar, Alyson Hannigan and Anthony Head, thinner elsewhere in the early years. It looks cheap because it was cheap, a late nineties network budget of rubber prosthetics and sets with a visible edge, which is why the visual grade sits two tiers under the rest. The sixth season still divides critics for going darker than the format supported, and the seventh runs its arc thin. The high seasons remain exceptional.

Reviewed Sep 8, 2026 · Last verified Sep 8, 2026 · How we grade

Buffy the Vampire Slayer at a glance

Network
The WB / UPN
Showrunner
Joss Whedon
Year
1997

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Plot
Cinematography
Acting
Dialogue

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More tv shows reviews