Mercedes-AMG GT 63 Review
2024GT 63Car
The new GT is heavier, softer and far more usable, which is either a betrayal or the correct decision.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Exterior | Great | |
| Interior luxury | Great | |
| Features | Great | |
| Reliability | Average | |
| Economy | Weak | |
| Depreciation | Weak | |
| Maintenance cost | Weak | |
| Innovation | Good | |
| Engine | Great | |
| User experience | Good | |
| Overall | Good |
The second generation GT gave up the pure two seat sports car brief and became a grand tourer with ambitions. It shares its structure with the SL, it drives all four wheels, it gained a pair of rear seats that will take children or bags, and it weighs nearly two tonnes as a result. What survived is the 4.0 litre twin-turbo V8, which in 63 form makes 577 horsepower and remains one of the great modern engines, hand assembled and thunderous in a way nothing electrified can imitate.
The proportions are still spectacular and the interior is the best in the AMG range. As a device for crossing a country very quickly it is close to ideal, with rear steering and active anti-roll making the mass largely disappear until you brake hard. The bills are serious. Fuel economy is poor, the tyres are expensive, and the electronics and air suspension are exactly the components that fail on ageing Mercedes. Residuals on AMGs are historically weak. Buy it with a warranty.
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 at a glance
Official site- Make
- Mercedes-AMG
- Model
- GT 63
- Model year
- 2024
- Body type
- Coupe
- Powertrain
- 4.0L twin-turbo V8
- Price
- 178650
- Range or economy
- 15/20 mpg
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.