Ford Mustang GT Review
2024Mustang GTCar
Still the cheapest way into a big naturally aspirated V8, and the seventh generation finally has a cabin.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Exterior | Good | |
| Interior luxury | Good | |
| Features | Good | |
| Reliability | Average | |
| Economy | Weak | |
| Depreciation | Average | |
| Maintenance cost | Good | |
| Innovation | Average | |
| Engine | Great | |
| User experience | Good | |
| Overall | Good |
The argument for a Mustang GT has always been arithmetic. Nothing else sells you five litres, eight cylinders and 486 horsepower for this money, and the seventh generation kept the manual gearbox alive when almost everyone else quietly deleted theirs. The chassis is competent rather than magical, with independent rear suspension that has been there since 2015 and a body that feels its size on a narrow road, but the engine is charismatic in a way that turbocharged rivals with more power are not.
Inside, the twin curved displays finally look like something from this decade, though the reliance on screens for basic functions costs it points in daily use. The rest is honest. Fuel economy is bad, especially in town. Reliability across the Coyote V8 is decent without being Japanese, and Ford's recent recall record is nothing to boast about. Depreciation is normal for a volume car, meaning steady and unremarkable. Maintenance is cheap, which on this list is almost exotic.
Ford Mustang GT at a glance
Official site- Make
- Ford
- Model
- Mustang GT
- Model year
- 2024
- Body type
- Coupe
- Powertrain
- 5.0L naturally aspirated V8
- Price
- 42495
- Range or economy
- 15/24 mpg
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.