Claude Opus 5 artwork

Claude Opus 5 Review

Claude Opus 5AI Model

Newer than 4.8, priced the same, and harder to recommend: the thinking switch it added is the thing to avoid.

CriticGood
Users8.0 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
Critical thinkingGreat
CodingGood
Repetitive tasksGood
Ease of useAverage
OverallGood

Opus 5 is the strange one: newer than 4.8, priced identically, and harder to recommend. The headline change is that thinking is now on by default, which sounds like an improvement and is, until you meet the failure modes on the other side of the switch. Explicitly disable it and the model will occasionally write a tool call into its visible text instead of emitting a real call, so the turn succeeds, nothing runs, and no error is raised anywhere.

In an agentic loop that silent failure poisons every later turn. It will also leak internal reasoning tags into responses. Disabling thinking is only accepted at high effort or below, so even the escape hatch is gated. Operationally it sits worse than its predecessor too: excluded from priority capacity entirely, and fast mode runs at double the standard rate. The 1M window, the $5 and $25 pricing and the raw reasoning are all genuinely good. But a model whose own guidance is to avoid the setting it just made configurable has not earned better than a B.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

Claude Opus 5 at a glance

Official site
Model
Claude Opus 5
Context window
1M tokens
Modalities
text, vision
Price
$5 / $25 per 1M tokens

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Critical thinking
Coding
Repetitive tasks
Ease of use

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More ai & llms reviews