The Boys artwork

The Boys Review

2019Eric KripkeTV Show

A superhero satire with one great villain and a plot that stopped moving after the third season.

CriticGood
Users8.0 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
PlotAverage
CinematographyGood
ActingGreat
DialogueGood
OverallGood

Antony Starr is the reason to watch and very nearly the only reason. Homelander is played as a man with unlimited power and no interior life, terrified of a crowd's disapproval, and Starr keeps finding new registers for that panic long after the writing stops giving him new situations. The first two seasons work because the satire is aimed carefully, at brand management, at the way an atrocity becomes a press strategy, at the specific horror of a workplace where the boss can kill you.

Then it stalls. Season three sets up a confrontation and defers it, season four defers it again, and the show develops a habit of substituting escalation for consequence, which is why the audience numbers have drifted so far below the critical ones. Karl Urban does a great deal with a character written as one note, and Erin Moriarty is stranded in a subplot that resets every year. The gore is inventive and the satire is loud. Neither is a substitute for a story that goes somewhere.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

The Boys at a glance

Network
Prime Video
Showrunner
Eric Kripke
Year
2019

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Plot
Cinematography
Acting
Dialogue

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More tv shows reviews