The Boys Review
2019Eric KripkeTV Show
A superhero satire with one great villain and a plot that stopped moving after the third season.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Average | |
| Cinematography | Good | |
| Acting | Great | |
| Dialogue | Good | |
| Overall | Good |
Antony Starr is the reason to watch and very nearly the only reason. Homelander is played as a man with unlimited power and no interior life, terrified of a crowd's disapproval, and Starr keeps finding new registers for that panic long after the writing stops giving him new situations. The first two seasons work because the satire is aimed carefully, at brand management, at the way an atrocity becomes a press strategy, at the specific horror of a workplace where the boss can kill you.
Then it stalls. Season three sets up a confrontation and defers it, season four defers it again, and the show develops a habit of substituting escalation for consequence, which is why the audience numbers have drifted so far below the critical ones. Karl Urban does a great deal with a character written as one note, and Erin Moriarty is stranded in a subplot that resets every year. The gore is inventive and the satire is loud. Neither is a substitute for a story that goes somewhere.
The Boys at a glance
- Network
- Prime Video
- Showrunner
- Eric Kripke
- Year
- 2019
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.