South Park Review
1997Trey Parker and Matt StoneTV Show
Nearly thirty years of construction paper satire, and still the fastest show on television at turning the week into a joke.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Good | |
| Cinematography | Average | |
| Acting | Great | |
| Dialogue | Great | |
| Overall | Great |
South Park's method is the whole argument for it. Parker and Stone build most episodes inside a single week, which means the show can answer a news cycle while the news cycle is still running, and no other comedy on television can do that. The deliberately crude animation, unchanged in spirit since 1997, is the production choice that buys the speed, and while critics long ago stopped treating it as a failing it is why the visual grade sits two tiers under the rest.
What the series is praised for is nerve: it goes at religion, celebrity, corporate cowardice and its own network with a consistency that has survived more than twenty five seasons, a Peabody and six Emmy wins for animation. The recent run of political episodes proved the machine still works. The faults are equally consistent. The topical installments age badly, the third act frequently collapses into a speech that explains the joke, and the both sides reflex the show reaches for can flatten a target that deserved sharper treatment.
Parker and Stone voice almost everyone and give the town a personality no imitator has managed. It is the most durable satire in American television.
South Park at a glance
- Network
- Comedy Central
- Showrunner
- Trey Parker and Matt Stone
- Year
- 1997
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.