Oz artwork

Oz Review

1997Tom FontanaTV Show

The show that proved cable drama could be brutal, and it is still nastier than its descendants.

CriticGood
Users8.0 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
PlotGood
CinematographyGood
ActingExceptional
DialogueGreat
OverallGood

This is where the modern cable drama starts, and the influence is easy to trace, because everything that followed took the serialized structure, the ensemble depth and the willingness to kill anyone from here. Fontana's experimental unit is a stage set and the show uses it that way, with Harold Perrineau narrating from a rotating glass cube in a device that should not work and mostly does. The casting is startling in retrospect. J.K. Simmons plays the most frightening man in the building without ever raising his voice, Christopher Meloni is genuinely unpredictable, and Rita Moreno supplies a moral center the show otherwise lacks.

What holds it back is a plotting instinct inherited from network television, where alliances form and dissolve on a weekly cycle and characters are killed for shock more often than for consequence. The later seasons pile on so many deaths that the violence stops meaning anything at all. It looks cheap, all fluorescent tile. Ugly, hugely influential, and much rawer than the prestige era it made possible.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

Oz at a glance

Official site
Network
HBO
Showrunner
Tom Fontana
Year
1997

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Plot
Cinematography
Acting
Dialogue

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More tv shows reviews