Battlestar Galactica Review
2004Ronald D. MooreTV Show
Science fiction with the nerve to make its heroes the insurgents, right up until the ending arrives.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Good | |
| Cinematography | Great | |
| Acting | Great | |
| Dialogue | Good | |
| Overall | Great |
The miniseries and the first two seasons are among the most serious things American genre television has attempted. Moore stripped the source of its camp entirely and built a fleet running out of fuel, water and people, with an on screen population counter that dropped and never rose. The New Caprica arc is the boldest sequence, casting the human resistance as suicide bombers against an occupying force that believes it is helping, and airing while those comparisons were extremely live.
Edward James Olmos and Mary McDonnell play two people making impossible administrative decisions and never let it curdle into speechmaking. The handheld zoom applied to space combat was a real innovation and has been copied constantly since. Where it fails is the mythology. The show promised that its religious framework had a plan, then resolved that promise with a revelation which reads as a shrug, and the final season is padded out with a mutiny arc and a musical clue. Extraordinary at its peak, and a permanent argument about how to end a mystery.
Battlestar Galactica at a glance
- Network
- Sci Fi Channel
- Showrunner
- Ronald D. Moore
- Year
- 2004
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.