Zodiac artwork

Zodiac Review

2007David FincherMovie

Fincher's most patient film, a procedural about paperwork that refuses to give anybody a solution.

CriticGood
Users8.0 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
PlotAverage
CinematographyGreat
ActingGood
DialogueGood
OverallGood

Fincher shot this digitally at a time when almost nobody was, and Harris Savides uses that flat low-noise image to make 1970s San Francisco look like documentary evidence rather than period pastiche. The reconstruction is the point: scenes were reshot exhaustively to match witness statements, and the film is assembled from case files, handwriting analysis and jurisdictional squabbles rather than suspense beats. That is also why it frustrates.

After the lakeside attack, staged in daylight with terrible calm, the film abandons the killer almost entirely and becomes a story about three men losing years to an unsolvable problem. Jake Gyllenhaal's Graysmith is written as pure fixation, which limits him, while Robert Downey Jr's Avery is the more interesting decay and Mark Ruffalo's Toschi grounds the middle. Two and a half hours of ledgers and dead ends is a genuine test of patience, and aside from one basement sequence the tension is intellectual rather than visceral. Admirable, meticulous and unsatisfying by deliberate design.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

Zodiac at a glance

Official site
Director
David Fincher
Runtime
157 min
Rating
R
Release year
2007

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Plot
Cinematography
Acting
Dialogue

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More movies reviews