Wedding Crashers artwork

Wedding Crashers Review

2005David DobkinMovie

Two hours of the best comic chemistry of the decade, attached to a third act that forgets what it was.

CriticGood
Users8.0 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
PlotGood
CinematographyGood
ActingGreat
DialogueGreat
OverallGood

For about seventy minutes this is close to a perfect studio comedy. Vaughn and Wilson play the double act as a genuine friendship rather than a premise, Vaughn talking in unbroken paragraphs while Wilson underplays everything, and the opening montage of crashed receptions is the most efficient comic exposition of its era. Christopher Walken gives the Secretary a real interior life instead of playing him as an obstacle, which is why the film's stakes land at all, and Isla Fisher commits so completely to a character written as a warning that she turns her into the funniest thing in the picture.

Rachel McAdams is asked to be the sane one and is very good at it. Then the third act arrives and the film loses its nerve. It separates the two leads, sends one into a montage of moping, and resolves the whole thing with a chase and a speech it has not earned, as though someone decided a comedy this loose needed to prove it was also a romance. What was anarchic becomes obedient. The first two thirds are quotable a generation later; the last third is the reason it is a B and not an A.

Reviewed Sep 10, 2026 · Last verified Sep 10, 2026 · How we grade

Wedding Crashers at a glance

Director
David Dobkin
Runtime
119 min
Rating
R
Release year
2005

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Plot
Cinematography
Acting
Dialogue

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More movies reviews