Wedding Crashers Review
2005David DobkinMovie
Two hours of the best comic chemistry of the decade, attached to a third act that forgets what it was.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Good | |
| Cinematography | Good | |
| Acting | Great | |
| Dialogue | Great | |
| Overall | Good |
For about seventy minutes this is close to a perfect studio comedy. Vaughn and Wilson play the double act as a genuine friendship rather than a premise, Vaughn talking in unbroken paragraphs while Wilson underplays everything, and the opening montage of crashed receptions is the most efficient comic exposition of its era. Christopher Walken gives the Secretary a real interior life instead of playing him as an obstacle, which is why the film's stakes land at all, and Isla Fisher commits so completely to a character written as a warning that she turns her into the funniest thing in the picture.
Rachel McAdams is asked to be the sane one and is very good at it. Then the third act arrives and the film loses its nerve. It separates the two leads, sends one into a montage of moping, and resolves the whole thing with a chase and a speech it has not earned, as though someone decided a comedy this loose needed to prove it was also a romance. What was anarchic becomes obedient. The first two thirds are quotable a generation later; the last third is the reason it is a B and not an A.
Wedding Crashers at a glance
- Director
- David Dobkin
- Runtime
- 119 min
- Rating
- R
- Release year
- 2005
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.