Transformers: Age of Extinction Review
2014Michael BayMovie
A reboot that changes the cast and nothing else, and holds the Dinobots hostage for two hours.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Avoid | |
| Cinematography | Average | |
| Acting | Weak | |
| Dialogue | Avoid | |
| Overall | Weak |
Calling this a fresh start was a marketing position rather than a creative one. The human cast changes, the structure does not, and the film runs a hundred and sixty five minutes with a plot that keeps handing off between a bounty hunter Transformer, a defence contractor building his own robots and a corporate villain in Chicago before relocating to Hong Kong for a finale shaped by the film's Chinese co financing. The product placement is so unembarrassed that a character stops to drink a named beer during an alien invasion.
Mark Wahlberg is a robotics inventor who cannot pay his mortgage, and the script devotes a scene to a laminated card explaining why his daughter's older boyfriend is legally in the clear, a joke it repeats twice. The Dinobots, sold on every poster, appear with roughly twenty minutes remaining and are ridden like horses. Kelsey Grammer is the one performer treating the material as a job worth doing. It made a billion dollars, which explains everything.
Transformers: Age of Extinction at a glance
Official site- Director
- Michael Bay
- Runtime
- 165 min
- Rating
- PG-13
- Release year
- 2014
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.