Top Gun Review
1986Tony ScottMovie
Peerless aerial photography bolted to a story with roughly the depth of a recruitment poster.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Weak | |
| Cinematography | Good | |
| Acting | Weak | |
| Dialogue | Weak | |
| Overall | Average |
The flying is the case for the defense and it is a strong one. Scott put camera crews aboard actual carrier operations and mounted rigs on airframes, so the dogfights carry g-force and disorientation that no ground-based simulation of the period approached, and the sequences are cut for spatial clarity rather than chaos. Stunt pilot Art Scholl died getting some of it. On the ground the film collapses. The script gives Maverick a dead father, a dead friend and a chip on his shoulder, then resolves all three with the same shot of a jet climbing, and the training-school plot has no antagonist beyond a rival who is demonstrably correct about him.
Cruise plays charisma rather than character, and Kelly McGillis is handed an astrophysicist instructor with nothing to instruct. Faltermeyer's synths and the soundtrack singles supply emotion the scenes have not earned. It is an extremely effective commercial for a lifestyle and a very thin film around it.
Top Gun at a glance
Official site- Director
- Tony Scott
- Runtime
- 110 min
- Rating
- PG
- Release year
- 1986
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.