Tombstone Review
1993George P. CosmatosMovie
A troubled production held together entirely by Val Kilmer, who gives the western one of its great performances.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Average | |
| Cinematography | Good | |
| Acting | Great | |
| Dialogue | Great | |
| Overall | Good |
The production history is visible on screen. George Cosmatos took over weeks into filming after Kevin Jarre was removed, the script was cut down in a hurry, and the second half moves through the vendetta ride in a series of montages that feel like a longer film compressed. Kurt Russell is solid and occasionally stiff as Wyatt Earp, and the romance with Dana Delany never once justifies the running time it takes.
What survives all of it is Val Kilmer. His Doc Holliday is playing three things at once, dying, bored and enormously entertained, and every line he is given becomes quotable in his mouth because he refuses to deliver any of it straight. The gunfight at the O.K. Corral is staged with unusual restraint, quick and confused and over in half a minute, which is closer to the historical record than most versions bother with. As a film it is lumpy and overstuffed. As a performance it is essential, and it is why people still quote this thirty years on.
Tombstone at a glance
- Director
- George P. Cosmatos
- Runtime
- 130 min
- Rating
- R
- Release year
- 1993
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.