Thor: Ragnarok artwork

Thor: Ragnarok Review

2017Taika WaititiMovie

Waititi throws out two films of continuity and rebuilds Thor as a comedy, which turns out to be what he was always for.

CriticGood
Users8.0 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
PlotAverage
CinematographyGreat
ActingGreat
DialogueGreat
OverallGood

Taika Waititi's solution to a character nobody had cracked was to notice that Chris Hemsworth is very funny and had never once been allowed to be. So Thor loses the hammer, the hair, an eye and his home planet, and gains a comic timing that turns a stiff lead into the best hang in the franchise. Sakaar is the most distinctive world the studio has built, all garbage heaps and neon Kirby geometry, and Jeff Goldblum's Grandmaster is a masterclass in confident nonsense.

Cate Blanchett strides through in antlers having an obviously wonderful time. Mark Mothersbaugh's synths and a well deployed Led Zeppelin cue give the final battle a swagger the series had not touched before. The cost is tonal coherence. Odin dies and the film moves on in ninety seconds, Asgard's history of conquest is raised as a genuinely serious idea and then dropped for a gag, and Karl Urban's Skurge and Idris Elba's Heimdall both deserve far better than they get. Hela is underwritten as a threat and overqualified as a presence. But the film is a blast, and it saved the character.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

Thor: Ragnarok at a glance

Official site
Director
Taika Waititi
Runtime
130 min
Rating
PG-13
Release year
2017

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Plot
Cinematography
Acting
Dialogue

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More movies reviews