Rush Review
2013Ron HowardMovie
Peter Morgan turns the 1976 Formula One season into a sharp two-hander about opposite ways to live, and Daniel Brühl's Niki Lauda steals it.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Good | |
| Cinematography | Great | |
| Acting | Great | |
| Dialogue | Great | |
| Overall | Great |
Peter Morgan builds Rush the way he built Frost/Nixon for Ron Howard, as a duel between two men who need each other more than either will admit. Chris Hemsworth's James Hunt treats risk as a lifestyle and Daniel Brühl's Niki Lauda treats it as arithmetic, saying exactly what he thinks of every car, team and rival. Brühl, nominated for the Golden Globe and the BAFTA, has the better lines and the harder arc, and Lauda's return to the cockpit after his burns is the film's centre.
Anthony Dod Mantle's camera stays low and close in saturated period colour, the races are cut with real speed (Daniel P. Hanley and Mike Hill won the BAFTA for editing), and Hans Zimmer's score does the rest. Olivia Wilde and Alexandra Maria Lara, as the two wives, are given little to play.
The history is bent for drama. The real Hunt and Lauda had shared a flat and were friends, and several confrontations are invented, though Lauda himself called the film very accurate. It took 98.2 million dollars worldwide on a 38 million dollar budget, only 26.9 million of it in North America.
Rush at a glance
- Director
- Ron Howard
- Runtime
- 123 min
- Rating
- R
- Release year
- 2013
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.