Reservoir Dogs Review
1992Quentin TarantinoMovie
A ferocious debut that announces a voice; the room is small and so is the story.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Good | |
| Cinematography | Good | |
| Acting | Great | |
| Dialogue | Great | |
| Overall | Good |
Reservoir Dogs is the sound of a voice arriving fully formed, and it is honest about being a small film. Quentin Tarantino cuts the heist out of the heist movie entirely; we get the diner argument about tipping, the aftermath bleeding out on a warehouse floor, and a nonlinear shuffle of flashbacks that turns a simple rat-hunt into a structure.
The dialogue carries everything: the Madonna exegesis, the commode story that Tim Roth's undercover cop rehearses like an actor building a role, which is the film quietly describing itself. Harvey Keitel's paternal Mr. White and Steve Buscemi's rattled professional Mr. Pink argue ethics while Michael Madsen's Mr. Blonde supplies the genre's most notorious torture scene, staged with the camera panning away, a cut more graphic in memory than on screen.
The limits are real. The single warehouse set is shot functionally rather than expressively, the plot mechanics amount to one question with one answer, and the women in the film total a few seconds of screen time. Next to what followed, it plays like a brilliant table read for a career. Essential as origin, modest as architecture.
Reservoir Dogs at a glance
- Director
- Quentin Tarantino
- Runtime
- 99 min
- Rating
- R
- Release year
- 1992
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.