Prince of Jutland Review
1994Gabriel AxelMovie
A cast this good should not sound this embarrassed, and Axel leaves the Amled legend as mud, stiff talk and little else.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Average | |
| Cinematography | Average | |
| Acting | Average | |
| Dialogue | Weak | |
| Overall | Weak |
Long before Shakespeare, Saxo Grammaticus told the story of a prince who feigns madness to avenge his father, and Gabriel Axel films it with a bareness that reads as poverty rather than rigour. The cast looks remarkable on paper. Gabriel Byrne plays the usurping brother Fenge with a sullen watchfulness, Helen Mirren gives Geruth a flicker of calculation the script refuses to develop, and Brian Cox turns up as the duke Aethelwine for four scenes of welcome grit.
Christian Bale, twenty years old and still reedy, plays Amled's false idiocy as sulking rather than strategy, so the central deception carries no tension whatever. The production looks underfunded in a way that flat daylight exposes: mud, plain timber halls, costumes that read as rental stock, a landscape shot with no feel for scale. Worst is the dialogue, a stiff pseudo archaic register the actors cannot speak without sounding faintly embarrassed by it.
What survives is the bleakness of the source, the sense that vengeance here is an obligation and not a passion, plus one decent late sequence in the burning hall where Axel finally lets the violence be ugly. Everything around that is inert, and a hundred and seven minutes still feels padded.
Prince of Jutland at a glance
- Director
- Gabriel Axel
- Runtime
- 107 min
- Release year
- 1994
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.