Knight of Cups Review
2015Terrence MalickMovie
The most beautiful photography of Malick's late period attached to the least he has ever had to say.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Weak | |
| Cinematography | Exceptional | |
| Acting | Average | |
| Dialogue | Average | |
| Overall | Average |
Emmanuel Lubezki's camera never stops drifting, and whatever else is going on here, the photography is a real achievement: wide lenses held low, daylight bent through glass towers, a party in an emptied Los Angeles house shot as though the operator wandered in uninvited. Terrence Malick threw out the screenplay, handing his cast situations instead of lines, and the result is a picture about a screenwriter's spiritual exhaustion that is itself exhausted.
Bale is asked to be a blank at the center and he obliges, moving through ten chapters, all but the last named for a tarot card, while women arrive, orbit and dissolve. Cate Blanchett gets nearest to a character, Natalie Portman is handed a grief the film never set up, and the others are costumes in sunlight. The whispered narration reaches for scripture and lands on fortune cookie.
One stretch works completely, the earthquake that shakes Rick awake in his modernist apartment and sends him out into the street on his knees, and Antonio Banderas is very funny for four minutes. A film about emptiness still has to be about something, and this one keeps mistaking the depiction of drift for an argument about it.
Knight of Cups at a glance
- Director
- Terrence Malick
- Runtime
- 118 min
- Rating
- R
- Release year
- 2015
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.