Jurassic Park Review
1993Steven SpielbergMovie
The last great practical monster movie and the first great digital one, and the kitchen scene still works.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Good | |
| Cinematography | Great | |
| Acting | Good | |
| Dialogue | Good | |
| Overall | Great |
What separates this from everything it inspired is patience. Spielberg spends an hour on wonder and paperwork before the fence goes down, and when the tyrannosaur arrives the sequence is built almost entirely from anticipation, a cup of water, a goat leg, a flare, with Dean Cundey lighting rain and headlights so you can always read the space. The mix of Stan Winston's animatronics and the early digital work still holds because the film keeps its creatures in weather and shadow rather than daylight, and because it cuts away at the exact moment a shot might expose itself.
The kitchen sequence is a masterclass in geometry, every hiding place established before it is needed. The human writing is the weakness, with chaos theory delivered as attitude and the children written as functions, though Sam Neill's slow thaw is played properly. The film's actual idea, that this was engineered by people who never asked whether they should, is stated too plainly in dialogue and then dramatized perfectly by everything else. It remains the best executed blockbuster of its decade.
Jurassic Park at a glance
Official site- Director
- Steven Spielberg
- Runtime
- 127 min
- Rating
- PG-13
- Release year
- 1993
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.