Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 artwork

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 Review

2011David YatesMovie

The payoff film, and the only one that gets to spend everything the series spent ten years saving.

CriticGreat
Users9.2 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
PlotGreat
CinematographyGreat
ActingExceptional
DialogueGood
OverallGreat

Everything the run had been slowly funding is spent here. The Battle of Hogwarts hands Yates a single location, a clock and a pile of debts, and he stages it at a scale the series had never risked: stone statues marching, a shield collapsing, students dying in the rubble of the place the first film introduced as a marvel. The Prince's Tale is why the film is remembered. Rickman plays thirty years of unrequited devotion in a few minutes of borrowed memory, and it retroactively improves performances he gave in 2001.

Maggie Smith and Matthew Lewis both get exits their characters had earned across a decade. It is not trouble free. The final duel is moved out of the Great Hall and away from every witness, which turns a public reckoning into two men falling off a roof, and Voldemort crumbling into ash is a softer end than the story deserved. The epilogue's aging makeup is a problem nobody solved, and the dialogue leans on portent where the earlier films leaned on character. Still, this is the rare franchise conclusion that behaves as though the ending mattered more than the next contract.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 at a glance

Official site
Director
David Yates
Runtime
130 min
Rating
PG-13
Release year
2011

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Plot
Cinematography
Acting
Dialogue

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More movies reviews