Ghostbusters Review
1984Ivan ReitmanMovie
A special-effects blockbuster carried almost entirely by three men refusing to take it seriously.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Average | |
| Cinematography | Average | |
| Acting | Good | |
| Dialogue | Good | |
| Overall | Average |
The premise is the joke and it is a very good one: paranormal catastrophe handled as pest control, with proton packs, filing cabinets, a receptionist and an unpaid loan. Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis wrote it as a much larger cosmic adventure and the trimming left a comedy about workplace deadpan, which suits the cast perfectly. Murray plays Venkman as a man who has correctly assessed that none of this is worth panicking about, and his best lines are audibly not on the page.
Ramis underplays as the technician who explains everything and reacts to nothing, and Rick Moranis contributes the most committed physical comedy in the film. Elmer Bernstein's score uses an ondes Martenot to keep a wink under the menace. The problems are structural. Sigourney Weaver's possession removes the funniest woman in the cast from the comedy, the second act runs on montage, and the Gozer finale is a shapeless effects sequence rescued only by a marshmallow punchline.
Ghostbusters at a glance
Official site- Director
- Ivan Reitman
- Runtime
- 105 min
- Rating
- PG
- Release year
- 1984
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.