Dunkirk Review
2017Christopher NolanMovie
Three timelines, almost no dialogue, and the most physical war film Nolan will ever make.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Good | |
| Cinematography | Exceptional | |
| Acting | Good | |
| Dialogue | Average | |
| Overall | Great |
Nolan builds a survival thriller around three clocks. The mole runs a week, the sea a day, the air an hour, and the strands are cut so they converge at the close, which means the same Spitfire passes overhead at three different points in its own life. Hoyte van Hoytema shoots nearly all of it on 65mm and IMAX with real boats and real Spitfires, and the difference is legible in every water shot. Hans Zimmer runs a Shepard tone underneath, a scale that seems to rise forever, so the tension has no floor and no release until the Elgar arrives.
There is very little dialogue and almost no interiority. Fionn Whitehead's soldier is barely named, Tom Hardy spends the film behind a mask, and Mark Rylance carries the only real conversation in the picture. That trade is deliberate and it does cost something, because nothing here is written the way Nolan's best scripts are written. As pure filmmaking, image and sound and structure doing all the work, we have not seen him better.
Dunkirk at a glance
Official site- Director
- Christopher Nolan
- Runtime
- 106 min
- Rating
- PG-13
- Release year
- 2017
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.