Donnie Darko Review
2001Richard KellyMovie
The dread and the imagery are real, but the time travel mythology is scaffolding pretending to be an explanation.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Good | |
| Cinematography | Great | |
| Acting | Great | |
| Dialogue | Great | |
| Overall | Great |
A jet engine falls out of nothing into a suburban bedroom, and the film never explains it, which turns out to be its method rather than its failure. Richard Kelly's Middlesex is a very specific October in 1988, and Steven Poster shoots it in a cold blue that makes the school hallway tracking shot, set to Tears for Fears, feel like a survey of a place already half drowned.
Gyllenhaal's performance is the strange thing at the center. The smile arrives a beat late, the eyes stay flat, and he keeps Donnie legible as a sick kid rather than a prophet. The casting around him is sharp, particularly Mary McDonnell as a mother who can tell something is wrong and has no vocabulary for it, and Patrick Swayze turning his own charm into a weapon during the Jim Cunningham seminars.
The mythology is where it thins badly. The Philosophy of Time Travel business, with its artifacts and its living receiver, reads like a structure imposed after the fact to license an ending, and the satire aimed at Kitty Farmer and the self-help circuit is broad enough to belong in a dumber film, breaking into a story that was doing fine on dread alone.
Donnie Darko at a glance
- Director
- Richard Kelly
- Runtime
- 113 min
- Rating
- R
- Release year
- 2001
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.