Death Proof Review
2007Quentin TarantinoMovie
Forty minutes of table talk, one great crash, and then the whole structure repeats itself.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Average | |
| Cinematography | Good | |
| Acting | Average | |
| Dialogue | Average | |
| Overall | Average |
Tarantino has called this his worst, and the honesty is more impressive than the film. Built as a grindhouse throwback with scratched reels and a missing sequence, it splits into two nearly identical halves, each opening with a long stretch of young women talking in a bar. The talk is meant to be the pleasure, but it circles without accumulating, and the second group is less interesting than the first, which is a fatal thing to discover ninety minutes in.
What survives are two pieces. The car crash that ends the first half is staged with a cruelty that no other director would sustain, replayed from four vantage points so you cannot look away from any of them. And the finale hands the film to Zoe Bell, a real stunt performer playing herself, strapped to the hood of a Challenger at speed with no digital safety net, which is the one thing here that no other movie can sell you. Kurt Russell is genuinely frightening and then genuinely pathetic. Everything between those pieces is a director enjoying his own voice alone in a room.
Death Proof at a glance
- Director
- Quentin Tarantino
- Runtime
- 113 min
- Rating
- R
- Release year
- 2007
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.