Children of Men artwork

Children of Men Review

2006Alfonso CuaronMovie

Cuaron's long takes are the whole event; the script around them is thinner than its reputation.

CriticAverage
Users7.0 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
PlotAverage
CinematographyExceptional
ActingGood
DialogueAverage
OverallAverage

The long takes are not showing off, they are the argument. Lubezki's car ambush and the Bexhill assault each run for minutes without a visible cut, using rigged vehicles and hidden stitches, and the effect is to deny the audience the escape of a cutaway. Blood on the lens stays on the lens. Cuaron builds his near-future Britain almost entirely in the background of frames, letting propaganda screens, livestock pens and refugee transports pass by unexplained, which is far more convincing world-building than any expository briefing.

Clive Owen is well used as an exhausted ordinary man rather than a hero, and Michael Caine's aging hippie supplies the only warmth. The problems are in the script. Characters exist to be killed on schedule, the militant faction turns villainous on a dime, the premise is never interrogated beyond its symbolism, and the dialogue is mostly functional shouting between set pieces. As pure filmmaking it is a landmark. As a story it is considerably slighter than the technique that carries it.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

Children of Men at a glance

Director
Alfonso Cuaron
Runtime
109 min
Rating
R
Release year
2006

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Plot
Cinematography
Acting
Dialogue

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More movies reviews