Casino Royale Review
2006Martin CampbellMovie
The reboot that stripped Bond back to a blunt instrument, and the only one of the modern run with a real love story in it.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Good | |
| Cinematography | Good | |
| Acting | Great | |
| Dialogue | Good | |
| Overall | Great |
Campbell had already restarted this series once and does it better here by taking away the gadgets, the quips and most of the invulnerability. The chase across a Madagascar building site sets the terms. Bond is slower, heavier and less elegant than the man he is following, and he wins by going through walls rather than over them. Daniel Craig arrived to open hostility and answered it with a performance that plays arrogance as insecurity, and by the Montenegro stretch the doubt has gone.
Eva Green is the reason the film works. Vesper is written as an equal and played as someone with her own film running offscreen, and the stairwell scene after the fight is more affecting than anything in the series before it. The poker is shot with more patience than sense, and the plot gives up on Le Chiffre with an hour still to run. The Venice ending is twenty minutes longer than it needs to be. Even so, this is the entry that made the character interesting again, and every Bond film since has been measured against it.
Casino Royale at a glance
- Director
- Martin Campbell
- Runtime
- 144 min
- Rating
- PG-13
- Release year
- 2006
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.