Arrival Review
2016Denis VilleneuveMovie
A first-contact film whose twist is grammatical, and it earns every second of it.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Great | |
| Cinematography | Good | |
| Acting | Good | |
| Dialogue | Good | |
| Overall | Great |
The structure is the achievement. What plays for ninety minutes as flashback turns out to be something else entirely, because a language that encodes time non-sequentially rewires the person who learns it, and so the film's grammar and the film's plot are revealed as the same object. That is a genuinely difficult idea to dramatize, and Villeneuve does it with almost no exposition dump. Bradford Young shoots the Montana site in low-contrast fog and underexposed interiors that make the shell read as weather rather than hardware, and Johann Johannsson's score, all groaning low brass and processed voice, sells the scale.
Amy Adams plays Louise as exhaustion and competence rather than wonder, which is the right instinct. Where it slackens is the geopolitics: the Chinese general subplot and the rogue-soldier bomb are machinery imported from a lesser film to manufacture a deadline, and the closing phone call states outright what the images had already achieved. The central idea remains the best science-fiction premise put on screen that decade.
Arrival at a glance
- Director
- Denis Villeneuve
- Runtime
- 116 min
- Rating
- PG-13
- Release year
- 2016
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.