Aliens Review
1986James CameronMovie
The rare sequel that changes genre entirely and comes out with more than it started with.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Great | |
| Cinematography | Great | |
| Acting | Great | |
| Dialogue | Great | |
| Overall | Great |
Refusing to repeat Ridley Scott is what makes this work. Scott made a haunted house in space, slow and sealed and singular. Cameron makes a war film about a technologically superior force walking into a place it does not understand and being taken apart, and the tonal shift from dread to combat is executed so confidently that the two films now read as complements rather than rivals. The middle hour is a masterclass in escalating pressure, the motion tracker in the ceiling crawl space, the ammunition pulled from the marines before they enter the reactor, the dropship coming down in flames.
Weaver turns Ripley into the genre's defining lead, and her Oscar nomination for a science fiction sequel remains close to unprecedented. The marines are broad types by design and a few of them never become more, Newt functions as much as a plot engine as a child, and the theatrical cut removes the colony material and the scene of Ripley learning her daughter died, which is exactly the material that makes the ending land. Even trimmed, it is close to perfect.
Aliens at a glance
Official site- Director
- James Cameron
- Runtime
- 137 min
- Rating
- R
- Release year
- 1986
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.