21 Jump Street artwork

21 Jump Street Review

2012Phil Lord and Christopher MillerMovie

A reboot of a forgotten television show that opens by admitting it is a reboot of a forgotten television show.

CriticGreat
Users9.2 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
PlotGood
CinematographyGood
ActingGood
DialogueGreat
OverallGreat

Nobody wanted this and the film knows it, which is why a deputy chief announces in the first act that the department is recycling an old program because it has run out of ideas. Having cleared the air, Phil Lord and Christopher Miller get to the premise that actually pays: two men who peaked and then failed in 2005 go back to a high school where the currency has completely changed, and the former jock discovers that caring about things is now the popular position.

The inversion is a genuinely good idea and the film mines it properly rather than stating it once. Channing Tatum is the revelation, a physical comedian nobody had bothered to use, and his bewilderment carries more of the picture than Jonah Hill's neediness does. The action is competently staged and the running joke about explosions failing to happen is a small delight. The final act collapses into exactly the undercover chase it spent an hour mocking, which is a real cost. But the central observation about how fast a social order dates is sharp.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

21 Jump Street at a glance

Official site
Director
Phil Lord and Christopher Miller
Runtime
109 min
Rating
R
Release year
2012

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Plot
Cinematography
Acting
Dialogue

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More movies reviews