12 Angry Men Review
1957Sidney LumetMovie
One room, ninety-six minutes, twelve men, and not a single wasted line of argument.
| Category | Critic | Users |
|---|---|---|
| Plot | Exceptional | |
| Cinematography | Great | |
| Acting | Exceptional | |
| Dialogue | Exceptional | |
| Overall | Exceptional |
Sidney Lumet's debut is a masterclass in doing more with less: one jury room, one sweltering afternoon, and a Reginald Rose script in which every piece of evidence is dismantled with the same care it was assembled. The switchblade driven into the table, the sixty-foot walk timed against a stopwatch, the indentations on the old woman's nose; each reversal lands because the film establishes its rules before it breaks them. Boris Kaufman's camera does the psychological work invisibly, opening above eye level on wide lenses and closing in low-angle telephoto, so the walls appear to press inward as certainty drains out of the room.
Henry Fonda plays Juror 8 with a stubbornness that never curdles into sanctimony, and Lee J. Cobb's final collapse, a bereaved father shredding a photograph he cannot look at, is one of the great capitulations on film. Twelve men, nearly all unnamed, are individuated purely through diction, posture and habit. Nothing here is decorative. The rain breaks exactly when the argument does, and the whole thing passes like a held breath.
12 Angry Men at a glance
- Director
- Sidney Lumet
- Runtime
- 96 min
- Rating
- Approved
- Release year
- 1957
What’s your grade?
Grade by category
No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works
Comments
Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.
No comments yet. Have the first take.