Attack on Titan artwork

Attack on Titan Review

2009Manga

A horror premise that turns out to be a history lesson, closing on the most argued over chapter of its decade.

CriticExceptional
Users10.0 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
StoryGreat
ArtGood
CharactersGreat
World-buildingExceptional
OverallExceptional

The construction is the achievement. Isayama plants the basement, the wall composition, the shape of the first titan attack and a dozen throwaway lines in the opening volumes, and the answers when they come are the ones the setup implied rather than replacements for it, which is why rereading the early chapters is a different experience from reading them. The world building goes further than the genre needed, into a colonial history, a diaspora, a press, an arms race and a set of grievances that all read as recognisable rather than allegorical.

Isayama's art is the weak leg. His anatomy is awkward, his action is often hard to parse, and the aerial manoeuvring that the adaptation made spectacular is frequently a muddle on the page, though his grotesques are genuinely disturbing and the layouts improve steadily. The final arc asks readers to accept a lead they have followed for thirty volumes committing something unforgivable, and the last chapter divides its readership to this day. Even those who reject the ending rarely dispute that the book earned the right to attempt it.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

Attack on Titan at a glance

Official site
Author
Hajime Isayama
Serialization start
2009
Volumes
34
Status
Complete

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Story
Art
Characters
World-building

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More manga reviews