Street Fighter V artwork

Street Fighter V Review

2016CapcomGame

Shipped as a beta with a box price and spent four years apologizing for it.

CriticAverage
Users7.0 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
Difficulty to makeAverage
VisualsAverage
StoryWeak
GameplayAverage
OverallAverage

The fundamentals were never the problem. The three button special layout, the V system giving each character a personal comeback tool, and a slower deliberate neutral all made for a game the professional scene could work with, and by Champion Edition the roster was enormous and the balance was fine. What Capcom shipped in 2016 was not that game. There was no arcade mode, no proper story, a survival mode with no saving between rounds, a broken matchmaking service that spent launch week offline, and delay based netcode in a year when the alternative was well understood and widely requested.

The visual style is flatter and shinier than its predecessor, the character models look plastic, and the tone lurches between grim and cartoon without settling. Piecemeal fixes arrived over four years, and the game people defend today is a different product from the one that was sold. Judging a release by what it was on release day, this is a bad one.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

Street Fighter V at a glance

Official site
Platforms
PS4, PC, Arcade
Developer
Capcom
Hours played
35
Year
2016

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Difficulty to make
Visuals
Story
Gameplay

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More games reviews