Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy (2017 Remake) artwork

Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy (2017 Remake) Review

2017Vicarious VisionsGame

Beautiful work on three PlayStation landmarks, undone by a jump arc that quietly made every one of them harder.

CriticGood
Users8.0 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
Difficulty to makeGood
VisualsGreat
StoryAverage
GameplayGood
OverallGood

As an art project this is close to flawless. Every level of three games is remade rather than upscaled, the animation is expressive in a way the originals could only gesture at, and the Wumpa jungle finally looks like the place the box art promised. The problem is buried in the code. All three games run on one physics model derived from the sequels, and Crash now has a pill shaped collision volume rather than the original's rectangle, so a jump that used to catch the edge of a platform slides off it instead.

The first game was already the harshest of the three, and this change sharpened it into something players who had beaten it in 1996 could not finish. Time trials added across the trilogy and the later free level drops are genuine value, and the presentation carried the series back into the conversation. But a faithful remake is judged on whether the old inputs still produce the old outcomes, and here they measurably do not.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy (2017 Remake) at a glance

Official site
Platforms
PlayStation 4, Xbox One, PC, Switch
Developer
Vicarious Visions
Hours played
25
Year
2017

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Difficulty to make
Visuals
Story
Gameplay

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More games reviews