Perfect Blue artwork

Perfect Blue Review

1997Anime

Satoshi Kon's debut, and already the sharpest film anyone has made about being watched.

CriticGreat
Users9.2 out of 10

Vote your grade

Category grades
CategoryCriticUsers
StoryGreat
AnimationGreat
CharactersGreat
OverallGreat

Kon's editing is the whole argument. Cuts land on matched gestures and matched sounds so that a scene from Mima's television drama becomes a scene in her apartment without a seam, and by the second half the film has trained its audience to distrust every transition. The stalker plot is almost incidental. What this is really about is a career decision made by a management team, a nude scene shot for the sake of a rebrand, and a fan base convinced it owns the person it consumed, and it was making that case in the mid nineties before the internet rendered the argument obvious.

Madhouse animates realistically rather than expressively, with plain rooms and unflattering angles, which is exactly what makes the hallucinations work when they arrive. Masahiro Ikumi's score is the weakest element, thin and dated in places. Aronofsky bought the remake rights and reproduced a shot outright, which tells you where the film sits with people who make them. It has aged into something closer to a forecast than a thriller.

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026 · Last verified Sep 7, 2026 · How we grade

Perfect Blue at a glance

Studio
Madhouse
Year
1997
Source
Novel
Schema.org type
Movie

What’s your grade?

Grade by category
Story
Animation
Characters

No account needed. Sign in so your grades follow you and count once. · how vote integrity works

Comments

Plain text, 500 characters. Be sharp, not cruel.

0/500

No comments yet. Have the first take.

More anime reviews